Monthly Archives: November 2010

What’s your ride? (meme)

My source for this is none other than the always studious, Nick Norelli.  His source was the always engaging, Mark Stevens.  My contribution to this meme will be relatively random, primarily because . . . well, you’ll see.

The car we used to have was this (but we sold it):

(2005 Mini Cooper, automatic)

The most fun car that I’ve driven so far since moving to England was this one (which was hired):

(2010 BMW 120d, M-series, 6-speed)

The one that we usually try to get when family comes into town is this one (and the one we presently have on hire, except ours is silver):

(2009[?] Vauxhall Insignia, Turbo diesel, 6-speed)

However, here is my usual, everyday ride:

(Just some ol’ Doc Martin’s that I found at a charity shop in Chipping Norton)

Leave a comment

Filed under Random

growth(?) in theological thinking

A while back, I did a post on the results of two definitive quizzes that determined not only my eschatology but also my theological affinities with the minds of generations past.  This evening, while doing some extra-curricular blog reading, I came across someone who recently took the theological quiz and it got me thinking.  I began to wonder if anything has changed in the two years since I last took the quiz.  Throwing caution to the wind I decided to take it over again, and here are the results:

You scored as Anselm.
Anselm is the outstanding theologian of the medieval period. He sees man’s primary problem as having failed to render unto God what we owe him, so God becomes man in Christ and gives God what he is due. You should read ‘Cur Deus Homo?’

[ratings in comparison with other theologians:]

Anselm……………………………..80%
Jonathan Edwards…………….67&
Friederick Schleiermacher….67%
John Calvin……………………….53%
Karl Barth…………………………47%
Jürgen Moltmann………………47%
Charles Finney…………………..33%
Paul Tillich………………………..33%
Augustine…………………………33%
Martin Luther……………………20%

I have a good deal of respect for Anselm, but I don’t think I fully adhere to his views.  (I think the quiz is rigged).  I did find it interesting that Calvin is slightly further down the list and that Schleiermacher moved up a few notches.  I was also intrigued by the fact that the bottom four are the same as last time, and the differences in percentages are not that significant.  Sorry boys, you just haven’t given me enough persuasion to move.

And just for fun, also to be fair and thorough, I (re)took the eschatology quiz for pretty much the same reasons.  Here are the results of that one:

You scored as Amillennialist
Amillenialism believes that the 1000 year reign is not literal but figurative, and that Christ began to reign at his ascension. People take some prophetic scripture far too literally in your view.

[ratings in comparison with other theologians:]

Amillennialist………………………80%
Moltmannian Eschatology……75%
Postmillenialist…………………….60%
Preterist…………………………….55%
Premillenialist……………………..35%
Dispensationalist…………………20%
Left Behind………………………..15%

I was a little surprised by this one.  (I guess the Amillennial view is about as close as I’m going to get the: I-don’t-really-mind-because-God’s-going-to-do-what-God’s-going-to-do-when-God’s-going-to-do-it-and-I-really-have-no-say-in-the-matter view.  Yeah, not a catchy title like the others).  I thought for sure that the Dispensational view and Left Behind crap category would have been much lower, but for some unknown reason they continue to haunt me.  If either one breaks 25% . . . I’m not really sure what I’ll do.

Leave a comment

Filed under Biblical-theology, Random

new read and two big thank yous

If you are not aware, Kenneth Schenck has recently published the first volume (of two) in his treatment of Paul’s life and teaching.  This first book is aptly called, Paul: Messenger of Grace.  Volume two of Schenck’s treatment is intriguingly called, Paul: Soldier of Peace, and it is set to be released sometime in the near future.  However, Schenck has been given permission by his publisher to blog drafts of both works; so if you would like to get a ‘sneak preview’, head over to his site and have a read. 

Once I learned that Schneck produced this treatment on Paul, I became rather excited; not just because it’s another book on Paul, but also because it’s a book on Paul done by Kenneth Schenck–a scholar and writer I admire.  I then e-mailed Schenck to see if it was too late for me to request a review copy of his new book, and I was given the gracious response: ‘let me see what I can do.’  (That was on 30-Oct).  Three days ago, a review copy from the kind people at Wesleyan Publishing House arrived at the house!  My deepest thanks go out to both Schenck and WPH.

(I’ve been making my way through the book during my lunch-time breaks, and hope to be finished with it sometime soon.  Once I’m done, I’ll write up a review and post it here).

Leave a comment

Filed under Biblical-theology, Book Reviews, Random

quote(s) of the day

There’s ugly, and then there’s bowling alley ugly.

–Jamey E. (via Facebook)

That gave me a good laugh.  Thanks, Jamey!  It did bring to mind a slightly related quote I heard years ago:

Beauty is only skin deep, but ugly goes clean to the bone.

–Dorothy Parker

Leave a comment

Filed under Random

fifteen shuffled songs meme

It began here, but I became aware of it here.  (Update: It’s since been picked up here, here and here). I’ll repost the ‘rule’ and then give my responses.

Here are the rules if you want to play:

1) Turn on your MP3 player or music player on your computer.
2) Go to SHUFFLE songs mode.
3) Write down the first 15 songs that come up–song title and artist–NO editing/cheating, please.

And now, the results of my shuffle . . . this could be interesting (or not):

1. ‘Abandoned Masquerade’ — Diana Krall
2. ‘Dance With You’ — Live
3. ‘The Christmas Song’ — John Denver
4. ‘Readymade’ — Beck
5. ‘Empty Bottle’ — Ingrid Michaelson
6. ‘My Heavenly’ — Jars of Clay
7. ‘Love Song for No One’ — John Mayer
8. ‘Thinking about God in Tomorrow’s World’ — NT Wright
9. ‘1B’ — Yo-yo Ma
10. ‘Serenade for Strings in C-major, Opus 48′ — Tchaikovsky
11. ‘Laugh as the Sun’ — Rusted Root
12. ‘When Love Comes to Town’ — U2
13. ‘Imaginary’ — Evanescence
14. ‘Loving You is Sweeter Than Ever’ — Susan Tedeschi
15. ‘Bubble Toes’ — Jack Johnson

And to follow my source’s source: I’ll invite anyone who wants to consider themselves tagged.

Leave a comment

Filed under Random

similar imagery, (slightly) different meanings

If you are remotely familiar with the work of NT Wright, especially as reflected in his lectures, his frequent use of imagery for the sake of explaining an idea should be equally familiar.  More times than not, these illustrations are enormously helpful for capturing either his own line of thought or the abstract idea he is attempting to describe.  When speaking about how believers can participate in the past while hoping for the future, Wright often employs the image of a train station. 

You could think of a railway line. Your train stops at stations; sometimes an express from behind you catches you up. Sometimes a train coming from ahead of you meets you. The past and future intersect with the present in a somewhat similar way. The redemptive past is with us and the future also.

‘Sacraments of the New Creation’

While this illustration has some flaws (as do all illustrations or analogies), I think it does provide us with a way for beginning to understand a seemingly inexplicable concept.  I have often used this image in my own teaching (giving Wright props, of course) and the results have been virtually the same.  Students will usually say, ‘I never would have thought of it that way, but that certainly makes sense.’ 

I’ve just started reading Mary Shelley‘s, Frankenstein mostly because I always wanted to but never did.  (Don’t worry: you’re still reading this same post.  This is not some non-Carl Sweatman interpolation).  For a lesser reason, I’m also reading it because I’ve heard that it is one of the most incredibly well-written and in many ways influential books of modern times.  Thus, I am reading the book to see why such accolades are given to it. 

While reading the first ‘letter’ by the charater, R. Walton, I was struck by a particular use of imagery.  Here is the quote in full, with the striking bit in italics:

I am already far north of London; and as I walk in the streets of Petersburg, I feel a cold northern breeze play upon my cheeks, which braces my nerves, and fills me with delight.  Do you understand this feeling?  This breeze, which has travelled from the regions towards which I am advancing, gives me a foretaste of those icy climes.  Inspirited by this wind of promise, my dreams become more fervent and vivid.

Frankenstein, 15

Did Wright know about this line?  More than likely–he’s a bright fellow.  Did Wright adapt this line of thought for his own purposes?  That I cannot answer with any certainty.  (I’ll leave that to him, if he chooses to comment).  However, I might be safe in saying that if Wright did know about this line of text, he would have seen something wonderfully true in what is said (or, expressed) and he would have known that truth to be applicable in other ways.

Leave a comment

Filed under Biblical-theology, Random

quote of the day

Top Gear‘s James May has put together another great series of shows as an independent host.  Before, the series Top Toys was about rediscovering classic toys and reproducing them in grandiose ways; this time, the series deals with how men can learn (once again) how to do manly-type tasks–hence the show’s title, Man Lab.  The quote for the day is from the introduction of the first episode:

This is a plug.  And last year research revealed that 8 out of 10 modern men are not entirely sure how to wire it up.  This is where man finds himself these days: 10,000 years in the making; 10,000 years of endeavour in the science and the arts and the humanities.  And within one generation he’s been reduced to a feckless, bed-wetting, parmesan-shaving imbecile who revels in his own uselessness.  Something has to be done.

Classic.

Leave a comment

Filed under Random