What would happen if the Reformed doctrine of “limited atonement” were understood from an eschatological perspective rather than one of predetermination?
Filed under Biblical-theology, Random
Tagged as belief, biblical interpretation, doctrine, interpretation, limited atonement, personal, Random, theology
It would still be wrong.
Why is that?
Well, I was being a little bit snarky, but since you ask. I think I see what you are getting at in that from the future looking back the specific number of people who benefit from the atonement is clear and unchangable. But this is a matter of perspective, not the actual extent of the atonement. Whether one considers the atonement from a predetermined past time or an eschatological future time, I don’t think it changes what the atonement is and neither does it change the scope of the atonement. Even from an eschatological perspective, those in hell where potential beneficiaries of the atoning work of Christ, which means the atonement is not limited in the sense that the Reformed tradition means when it talks about limited atonement.
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Notify me of follow-up comments via email.
Notify me of new posts via email.
Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
Join 60 other followers
Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.