For the first time in a long time, I will keep my commentary on a particular news story rather brief. Reason being: the more I think about this story the more it bugs me.
Here’s my rant and then I need to get back to work: giving generously to others for the purpose of gaining something personally in return is not generous giving; it’s called self-serving at minimum, not disintrested somewhere in the middle and deceitful at maximum. In effect, that sort of (as they call it: ‘self-interested’) giving demeans the very nature of generosity. The result of their definition of generosity and the reasons for its practice is that genuine acts of generosity will then be (by default) considered suspect.